I. Statement of Policy

The Land Trust Accreditation Commission’s values include integrity, accountability and service. In keeping with these values, the Commission is committed to operating a credible accreditation program that fosters public accountability for accredited land trusts and the Commission.

The Commission requires that accredited land trusts continually conform to the accreditation indicator practices and program requirements. The Commission may receive information about an accredited land trust’s compliance with the indicator practices or program requirements in several ways.

· Accredited land trusts are required to notify the Commission in writing of any major changes in their structure or operation that could potentially affect their intent and ability to comply with the accreditation indicator practices or program requirements.

· The public may submit signed, written comments that document an accredited land trust may not be in compliance with the accreditation indicator practices or program requirements.

· The Commission may ask land trusts for additional data on their activities at any time during the term of their accredited status and may also receive information from other sources.

It is beyond the authority or role of the Commission to intervene in internal disputes within accredited land trusts, disputes between land trusts, and disputes between land trusts and other individuals or agencies. The Commission’s responsibility is limited to accredited land trusts and those that are applying for accreditation. It does not respond to comments regarding land trusts that are not accredited or that do not have applications pending.

The Commission follows the process outlined in the Applicant Handbook for accepting comments from the public on applications that are pending before the Commission. The procedures described in this Compliance Confirmation Policy and Procedures clarify how the Commission will respond to and evaluate information regarding an accredited land trust’s compliance with the accreditation indicator practices or program requirements. Decisions made in accordance with this Compliance Confirmation Policy and Procedures are made solely at the discretion of the Commission.

A. Evaluating Information Received on Potential Noncompliance

1. The Commission may receive information suggesting that an accredited land trust is no longer in compliance with the accreditation indicator practices or program requirements from a variety of sources, including but not limited to:

a. Information provided by the accredited land trust;

b. Information provided by the public; or,

c. Information provided by a representative of the Commission.

2. In order for the Commission to evaluate a noncompliance concern, it must be attributed and in writing, regardless of its source. Anonymous submissions will not be considered. The written information should contain as much detail as possible about the circumstances that form the basis of the concern and cite the relevant accreditation indicator practices or program requirements.

3. When information of concern is received, the executive director will make an initial determination, generally within 21 days (calendar days here and throughout this policy) of the transmission of the information, of whether the concern contains issues relating to compliance with the accreditation indicator practices or program requirements.

a. If the executive director determines that the information is not relevant to issues relating to compliance with the accreditation indicator practices or program requirements, the information will be kept on file with the Commission for 5 years, but no further formal actions will be taken. The executive director may respond to the person with the concern and inform him/her that the concern is outside of the scope of the Commission’s jurisdiction.

b. If the executive director determines that the information may be relevant, he/she will discuss the issue with the chair (or throughout this policy, vice chair if chair is unavailable) of the Commission. The chair and executive director will determine if:

i. No further action is required.

ii. Information needs clarification and how it will be clarified. Repeat step II.A.3.b with the clarified information.

iii. The information has come directly from the land trust, and whether the investigation will proceed as described in section II.B. below.

iv. The information is from a source other than the land trust, and whether to take the steps outlined in sections II.A.4–6 below.

4. If the determination is made in section II.A.3.iv. to proceed, the executive director will contact the complainant or person with information on noncompliance to request the following:

a. Additional documentation or corroboration, if needed.

b. A signed release (can be via email) allowing the written concern to be shared with the land trust in question and with other persons authorized by the land trust as necessary to fully investigate the concern. (Consistent with other Land Trust Accreditation Commission policies, the name of the complainant may be withheld from the written material forwarded to the land trust at the Commission’s discretion if it determines that releasing the name would have adverse consequences for the complainant.)

5. If the person with the information does not comply with either request, no further formal action will be taken.

6. If a signed release is received, the Commission will acknowledge receipt of the release and take the actions outlined in section II.B. below.

B. Land Trust Response to Information

1. If a signed release is received or information suggesting noncompliance has come from the land trust itself, Commission staff will provide the land trust sufficient opportunity to provide a written response to the noncompliance concern and/or to describe any actions the land trust is taking in response. A response ordinarily will be requested within 30 days.

2. The executive director will provide a summary of the concern and the land trust’s response to the Commission’s executive committee and copy the entire Commission on the information.

3. The executive committee will review the summary at its next meeting or any special meeting called for this purpose and will take one of the following actions:

a. Recommend that no action be taken.

b. Authorize additional investigation to be coordinated by staff. Addition investigation may include, but is not limited to: Web or print research, documented interviews, site visits, etc.

i. Information obtained during the additional investigation stage will be provided to the land trust with the option for a written response and steps II.B.1-3 will be repeated.

c. Recommend disciplinary action for consideration by the full Commission.

4. The Commission will review the recommendation of the executive committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting or at any special meeting called for this purpose, and will take one of the following actions:

a. Decide to take no action.

b. Authorize additional investigation to be coordinated by staff. Additional investigation may include, but is not limited to: Web or print research, documented interviews, site visits, etc.

i. Any information obtained during the additional investigation stage will be provided to the land trust with the option for a written response and the response will be provided to the executive committee to repeat step II.B.3.

c. Decide to take disciplinary action following the Commission’s Disciplinary Action Policy and Procedures.

5. After a meeting of the full Commission, staff will take the following action:

a. Staff will inform the land trust of the action of the Commission.